LITTLE KNOWN FACTS ABOUT H4831SC.

Little Known Facts About h4831sc.

Little Known Facts About h4831sc.

Blog Article

I'm a true lover of the H4831 powder. I get wonderful velocity and precision away from any caliber I've tried out it in. Within the 25-06 up for the 338 it truly is my head over to powder of alternative. I test every kind of powders when Functioning up loads, even so the H4831 constantly seems to come out on leading for accuracy and velocity when the case is from the 06 class or larger.

On the subject of bench rest matches, Hodgdon® rifle powders have posted more wins than all other propellants combined. A fine extruded powder, it flows properly and easily by way of measures and provides match-grade precision when set to implement.

Can they be interchanged without problems other then employing normal load procedures when switching from lot to good deal?

Minnesota H4831SC is my drop by in the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am saving the minimal I have remaining for drop 2021. I might start out very low and perform your way up, based on what load data you evaluate for this combo the min/max loads are all around the board.

Novice to reloading. This will be employed for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I had been capable of get my palms on a few pounds of h4831.

It really is probably that no additional dialogue is required, where situation we recommend starting up a different thread. If having said that you really feel your response is required you are able to nevertheless do so.

Nampa, Idaho In my practical experience the one authentic variance would be that the shortcut meters superior by way of reloading devices. The moment It truly is loaded theres no purposeful change. I have listened to that the shortcut may have a very small little bit more quickly burn rate but It appears insignificant.

Like said higher than, very same stuff. All that differs is the h4831sc load data size of your kernels. I did listen to somewhere that they're going to only make the SC in the future. I don't know if which is true or not but would seem sensible to me. I use SC for the reason that that is certainly what I present in the eight lb jug and it works.

I have located the exact opposite for being correct in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and Similarly correct powder in my 300 Get Mag.

It is really amusing how over the years loading plenty of various cartridges in numerous rifles which i have h4831 vs h4831sc never obtained appropriate close final results with H-4831 or maybe the quick-Slice version.

So happy your acquiring more sorts of powder back in. Now you must get primers back in stock and reloaded can get started reloading once more.. just indicating

It has been h4831sc a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Uncovered a node and shot some groups. I shot a .six five shot group now. It really is a little bit slower than H1000, but shoots very good. Many thanks for the advice, It truly is good to realize that I have received selections when one or another powder is dried up.

rayporter mentioned: i under no circumstances discovered a variance aside from the typical is like rolling cordwood on to the the pan. Click on to broaden...

The fact that the H4831 is in fact a slower burning powder is exactly why you might be observing higher velocities received with that powder, instead of Anything you've witnessed Using the IMR things.

Report this page